All polling places in Dunkley

2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Chelsea Heights (Dunkley)

Dunkley, VIC · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 4144

Chelsea Heights Primary School, 194 Thames Prmnde, CHELSEA HEIGHTS, VIC, 3196

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Download attributed result cardView this booth at the AEC

Formal votes

1,011

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

59

5.51% of 1,070 total ballots.

First preferences

1,011 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Jodie BELYEA
Australian Labor Party		45545.00%
Nathan CONROY
Liberal		27226.90%
Matt MABER
The Greens		13012.86%
Jessica DAVIS
Pauline Hanson's One Nation		504.95%
Lisa ABBOTT
Legalise Cannabis Party		424.15%
Peter NICHOLES
Family First		292.87%
Robert THURLEY
Independent		191.88%
Andrew GATLEY
FUSION | Planet Rescue | Whistleblower Protection | Innovation		141.38%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

1,011 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Jodie BELYEA
Australian Labor Party		64663.90%
Nathan CONROY
Liberal		36536.10%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 1,011 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party64663.90%
Liberal/National Coalition36536.10%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

Chelsea Heights in 2022 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

No continuous trend is shown because:

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsChelsea Heights (Dunkley)1Chelsea Heights (Isaacs)2Chelsea Central (Isaacs)3Chelsea Central (Dunkley)4Chelsea5Edithvale6Bonbeach7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Chelsea Heights (Dunkley) — selected polling place
  2. Chelsea Heights (Isaacs), Isaacs · 0.0 km · 1,202 formal votes · Labor TPP 67.05%
  3. Chelsea Central (Isaacs), Isaacs · 1.7 km · 366 formal votes · Labor TPP 68.85%
  4. Chelsea Central (Dunkley), Dunkley · 1.7 km · 1,645 formal votes · Labor TPP 66.75%
  5. Chelsea, Isaacs · 2.2 km · 458 formal votes · Labor TPP 64.85%
  6. Edithvale, Isaacs · 2.4 km · 1,983 formal votes · Labor TPP 63.44%
  7. Bonbeach, Dunkley · 2.5 km · 1,402 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.06%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.