2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Bruthen

Gippsland, VIC · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 3732

Bruthen Mechanics Institute, 49 Main St, BRUTHEN, VIC, 3885

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

464

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

20

4.13% of 484 total ballots.

First preferences

464 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Darren CHESTER
The Nationals
23250.00%
Sonny STEPHENS
Australian Labor Party
7716.59%
Gregory HANSFORD
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
6914.87%
Rochelle HINE
The Greens
6313.58%
Simon WILSON
Libertarian
234.96%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

464 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Darren CHESTER
The Nationals
32369.61%
Sonny STEPHENS
Australian Labor Party
14130.39%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 464 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party14130.39%
Liberal/National Coalition32369.61%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

Bruthen in 2022 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 23.06% in 2022 and 30.39% in 2025; 7.33 percentage points (2025 minus 2022). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsBruthen1Johnsonville2Metung3Lucknow4Eastwood5Bairnsdale6Nowa Nowa7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Bruthen — selected polling place
  2. Johnsonville, Gippsland · 12.6 km · 566 formal votes · Labor TPP 24.56%
  3. Metung, Gippsland · 19.6 km · 501 formal votes · Labor TPP 38.52%
  4. Lucknow, Gippsland · 20.0 km · 229 formal votes · Labor TPP 22.27%
  5. Eastwood, Gippsland · 21.2 km · 766 formal votes · Labor TPP 28.59%
  6. Bairnsdale, Gippsland · 22.1 km · 958 formal votes · Labor TPP 27.66%
  7. Nowa Nowa, Gippsland · 23.1 km · 131 formal votes · Labor TPP 22.90%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.