2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Deepwater

New England, NSW · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 1931

Deepwater School of Arts, 72 Tenterfield St, DEEPWATER, NSW, 2371

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

243

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

9

3.57% of 252 total ballots.

First preferences

243 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Barnaby JOYCE
The Nationals
11848.56%
Laura HUGHES
Labor
4217.28%
Brent LARKHAM
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
3012.35%
Wendy WALES
The Greens
187.41%
Holly MASTERS
Family First
166.58%
Natasha LEDGER
Independent
114.53%
Todd Charles JUCHAU
Trumpet of Patriots
83.29%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

243 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Barnaby JOYCE
The Nationals
17371.19%
Laura HUGHES
Labor
7028.81%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 243 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party7028.81%
Liberal/National Coalition17371.19%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

Deepwater in 2022 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 28.74% in 2022 and 28.81% in 2025; 0.07 percentage points (2025 minus 2022). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 5 of 5 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsDeepwater1Emmaville2Glen Innes3Glen Innes West4Tenterfield5

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Deepwater — selected polling place
  2. Emmaville, New England · 23.8 km · 194 formal votes · Labor TPP 25.26%
  3. Glen Innes, New England · 34.5 km · 279 formal votes · Labor TPP 35.48%
  4. Glen Innes West, New England · 35.1 km · 830 formal votes · Labor TPP 29.64%
  5. Tenterfield, New England · 46.4 km · 563 formal votes · Labor TPP 29.66%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.