2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Mount Eliza (Dunkley)

Dunkley, VIC · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 120398

Mount Eliza Secondary College, 204 Canadian Bay Rd, MOUNT ELIZA, VIC, 3930

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

355

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

24

6.33% of 379 total ballots.

First preferences

355 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Nathan CONROY
Liberal
13638.31%
Jodie BELYEA
Australian Labor Party
12033.80%
Matt MABER
The Greens
4211.83%
Jessica DAVIS
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
195.35%
Robert THURLEY
Independent
185.07%
Lisa ABBOTT
Legalise Cannabis Party
143.94%
Peter NICHOLES
Family First
30.85%
Andrew GATLEY
FUSION | Planet Rescue | Whistleblower Protection | Innovation
30.85%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

355 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Jodie BELYEA
Australian Labor Party
18251.27%
Nathan CONROY
Liberal
17348.73%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 355 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party18251.27%
Liberal/National Coalition17348.73%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

No matching AEC polling-place ID in 2022. The booth may be new, closed, renamed or recoded. We do not join records by name alone. Search the other election separately.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsMount Eliza (Dunkley)1Mount Eliza (Flinders)2Mount Eliza South3Mount Eliza North4Mount Eliza Central5Mount Eliza West6Frankston South West7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Mount Eliza (Dunkley) — selected polling place
  2. Mount Eliza (Flinders), Flinders · 0.0 km · 909 formal votes · Labor TPP 48.84%
  3. Mount Eliza South, Flinders · 0.6 km · 1,146 formal votes · Labor TPP 52.27%
  4. Mount Eliza North, Dunkley · 0.6 km · 478 formal votes · Labor TPP 50.42%
  5. Mount Eliza Central, Flinders · 0.9 km · 465 formal votes · Labor TPP 39.78%
  6. Mount Eliza West, Flinders · 1.5 km · 838 formal votes · Labor TPP 49.05%
  7. Frankston South West, Dunkley · 2.2 km · 1,140 formal votes · Labor TPP 55.79%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.