2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Charles Sturt

Riverina, NSW · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 109778

CSU Convention Centre, 286 Pine Gully Rd, CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY, NSW, 2678

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

339

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

31

8.38% of 370 total ballots.

First preferences

339 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Michael McCORMACK
The Nationals
12536.87%
Mark JEFFRESON
Labor
6017.70%
Jenny ROLFE
Independent
4011.80%
Mark CRAIG
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
3410.03%
Pheonix VALXORI
The Greens
247.08%
James GOODEN
Independent
205.90%
Mark BURGE
Family First
113.24%
Barbara BAIKIE
Independent
82.36%
Desiree GREGORY
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party
72.06%
Richard FOLEY
Citizens Party
72.06%
Christine ONLEY
Libertarian
20.59%
Grant HARDWICK
Independent
10.29%
Jake DAVIS
Independent
00.00%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

339 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Michael McCORMACK
The Nationals
19156.34%
Mark JEFFRESON
Labor
14843.66%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 339 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party14843.66%
Liberal/National Coalition19156.34%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

No matching AEC polling-place ID in 2022. The booth may be new, closed, renamed or recoded. We do not join records by name alone. Search the other election separately.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsCharles Sturt1Estella2Wagga Wagga North3Wagga Wagga4Wagga Wagga South5Ashmont6Turvey Park7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Charles Sturt — selected polling place
  2. Estella, Riverina · 1.3 km · 808 formal votes · Labor TPP 44.43%
  3. Wagga Wagga North, Riverina · 5.3 km · 1,023 formal votes · Labor TPP 35.19%
  4. Wagga Wagga, Riverina · 6.1 km · 1,027 formal votes · Labor TPP 47.52%
  5. Wagga Wagga South, Riverina · 7.3 km · 723 formal votes · Labor TPP 44.81%
  6. Ashmont, Riverina · 7.8 km · 759 formal votes · Labor TPP 51.38%
  7. Turvey Park, Riverina · 8.2 km · 1,144 formal votes · Labor TPP 50.70%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.