2025 federal House election · Official AEC results

Diamond Creek West

McEwen, VIC · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 109570

Diamond Creek Primary School, 17 Clyde St, DIAMOND CREEK, VIC, 3089

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

762

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

30

3.79% of 792 total ballots.

First preferences

762 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Rob MITCHELL
Australian Labor Party
30640.16%
Jason McCLINTOCK
Liberal
22529.53%
Marley McRAE McLEOD
The Greens
12015.75%
Tom FORREST
Legalise Cannabis Party
334.33%
Jeremy JOHNSON
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
233.02%
Ali ANTONIOU
Gerard Rennick People First
212.76%
Julio G VALENCIA
Family First
141.84%
Chloe NICOLOSI
Animal Justice Party
101.31%
Erin McGRATH
FUSION | Planet Rescue | Whistleblower Protection | Innovation
101.31%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

762 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Rob MITCHELL
Australian Labor Party
46861.42%
Jason McCLINTOCK
Liberal
29438.58%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 762 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party46861.42%
Liberal/National Coalition29438.58%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2022

No matching AEC polling-place ID in 2022. The booth may be new, closed, renamed or recoded. We do not join records by name alone. Search the other election separately.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsDiamond Creek West1Diamond Creek2Diamond Creek East3St Helena (McEwen)4St Helena (Jagajaga)5Eltham North Upper6Plenty7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Diamond Creek West — selected polling place
  2. Diamond Creek, McEwen · 0.6 km · 1,987 formal votes · Labor TPP 59.79%
  3. Diamond Creek East, McEwen · 1.3 km · 947 formal votes · Labor TPP 54.70%
  4. St Helena (McEwen), McEwen · 2.0 km · 602 formal votes · Labor TPP 53.99%
  5. St Helena (Jagajaga), Jagajaga · 2.0 km · 1,316 formal votes · Labor TPP 57.45%
  6. Eltham North Upper, Jagajaga · 2.4 km · 1,210 formal votes · Labor TPP 62.81%
  7. Plenty, McEwen · 2.6 km · 984 formal votes · Labor TPP 42.58%

AEC 2025 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2025-06-16T10:39:14 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2025, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.