2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Oakleigh CHISHOLM PPVC

Chisholm, VIC · Pre-poll centre · AEC polling-place ID 98121

Masonic Hall, 150 Drummond St, OAKLEIGH, VIC, 3166

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

2,202

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

185

7.75% of 2,387 total ballots.

First preferences

2,202 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Carina GARLAND
Australian Labor Party
88740.28%
Gladys LIU
Liberal
74333.74%
Sarah NEWMAN
The Greens
29513.40%
Melanie Merle KEMPSON
United Australia Party
723.27%
Ethelyn KING
Liberal Democrats
552.50%
Aaron TYRRELL
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
442.00%
Dominique MURPHY
Independent
331.50%
Rod WHITFIELD
Animal Justice Party
241.09%
Thomas STANFIELD
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party
200.91%
Anthea ANTONIE
Australian Federation Party
140.64%
Wayne TSENG
Independent
100.45%
Ryan DARE
Citizens Party
50.23%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

2,202 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Carina GARLAND
Australian Labor Party
1,26357.36%
Gladys LIU
Liberal
93942.64%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 2,202 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party1,26357.36%
Liberal/National Coalition93942.64%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Oakleigh CHISHOLM PPVC in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

No continuous trend is shown because:

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsOakleigh CHISHOLM PPVC1Oakleigh (Chisholm)2Oakleigh (Higgins)3Oakleigh (Hotham)4Oakleigh Central5Oakleigh East (Hotham)6Oakleigh East (Chisholm)7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Oakleigh CHISHOLM PPVC — selected polling place
  2. Oakleigh (Chisholm), Chisholm · 0.0 km · 289 formal votes · Labor TPP 52.94%
  3. Oakleigh (Higgins), Higgins · 0.0 km · 115 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.74%
  4. Oakleigh (Hotham), Hotham · 0.0 km · 1,331 formal votes · Labor TPP 64.84%
  5. Oakleigh Central, Hotham · 1.0 km · 986 formal votes · Labor TPP 68.46%
  6. Oakleigh East (Hotham), Hotham · 1.4 km · 1,187 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.92%
  7. Oakleigh East (Chisholm), Chisholm · 1.4 km · 476 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.76%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.