2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Gray

Solomon, NT · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 8887

Gray Primary School, 22 Victoria Dr, GRAY, NT, 0830

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

675

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

41

5.73% of 716 total ballots.

First preferences

675 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Luke GOSLING
A.L.P.
27741.04%
Tina MACFARLANE
NT CLP
13219.56%
Aiya GOODRICH CARTTLING
The Greens
11216.59%
Emily LOHSE
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
669.78%
Kylie BONANNI
Liberal Democrats
527.70%
Tayla Elise SELFE
United Australia Party
365.33%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

675 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Luke GOSLING
A.L.P.
41361.19%
Tina MACFARLANE
NT CLP
26238.81%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 675 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party41361.19%
Liberal/National Coalition26238.81%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Gray in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 46.06% in 2025 and 61.19% in 2022; 15.13 percentage points (2022 minus 2025). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsGray1Driver2Bakewell3Durack4Woodroffe5Rosebery6Johnston7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Gray — selected polling place
  2. Driver, Solomon · 1.0 km · 872 formal votes · Labor TPP 52.18%
  3. Bakewell, Solomon · 1.5 km · 1,098 formal votes · Labor TPP 54.01%
  4. Durack, Solomon · 1.7 km · 914 formal votes · Labor TPP 49.02%
  5. Woodroffe, Solomon · 1.9 km · 461 formal votes · Labor TPP 60.09%
  6. Rosebery, Solomon · 2.6 km · 998 formal votes · Labor TPP 50.20%
  7. Johnston, Lingiari · 3.0 km · 1,091 formal votes · Labor TPP 46.84%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.