2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Latham

Fenner, ACT · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 8825

Latham Primary School, 48 O'Loghlen St, LATHAM, ACT, 2615

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

1,328

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

54

3.91% of 1,382 total ballots.

First preferences

1,328 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Andrew LEIGH
Australian Labor Party
67050.45%
Nathan KUSTER
Liberal
28721.61%
Natasa SOJIC
The Greens
25819.43%
Timothy Peter ELTON
United Australia Party
453.39%
Lucia GRANT
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
413.09%
Guy JAKEMAN
Liberal Democrats
272.03%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

1,328 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Andrew LEIGH
Australian Labor Party
96072.29%
Nathan KUSTER
Liberal
36827.71%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 1,328 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party96072.29%
Liberal/National Coalition36827.71%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Latham in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 75.55% in 2025 and 72.29% in 2022; -3.26 percentage points (2022 minus 2025). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsLatham1Florey2Scullin3Holt West4Holt5Charnwood6Macgregor7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Latham — selected polling place
  2. Florey, Fenner · 0.8 km · 1,183 formal votes · Labor TPP 69.82%
  3. Scullin, Fenner · 1.5 km · 975 formal votes · Labor TPP 78.56%
  4. Holt West, Fenner · 1.5 km · 830 formal votes · Labor TPP 68.07%
  5. Holt, Fenner · 1.6 km · 1,887 formal votes · Labor TPP 67.67%
  6. Charnwood, Fenner · 1.7 km · 1,640 formal votes · Labor TPP 65.30%
  7. Macgregor, Fenner · 2.2 km · 1,864 formal votes · Labor TPP 71.62%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.