2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Gilmore

Bean, ACT · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 8771

Gilmore Primary School, 219 Heagney Cres, GILMORE, ACT, 2905

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

1,493

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

82

5.21% of 1,575 total ballots.

First preferences

1,493 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
David SMITH
Australian Labor Party
56037.51%
Jane HIATT
Liberal
51934.76%
Kathryn Jane SAVERY
The Greens
17711.86%
Jamie CHRISTIE
Independent
1187.90%
Benjamin AMBARD
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
714.76%
Sean CONWAY
United Australia Party
483.22%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

1,493 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
David SMITH
Australian Labor Party
86157.67%
Jane HIATT
Liberal
63242.33%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 1,493 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party86157.67%
Liberal/National Coalition63242.33%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Gilmore in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 64.95% in 2025 and 57.67% in 2022; -7.28 percentage points (2022 minus 2025). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsGilmore1Chisholm2Richardson3Fadden4Gowrie5Calwell6Theodore7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Gilmore — selected polling place
  2. Chisholm, Bean · 1.3 km · 1,242 formal votes · Labor TPP 58.94%
  3. Richardson, Bean · 2.2 km · 1,210 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.24%
  4. Fadden, Bean · 2.2 km · 1,541 formal votes · Labor TPP 62.56%
  5. Gowrie, Bean · 2.3 km · 1,443 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.95%
  6. Calwell, Bean · 2.9 km · 1,735 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.38%
  7. Theodore, Bean · 3.3 km · 1,402 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.34%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.