2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Millner

Solomon, NT · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 83440

Millner Primary School, 41 Sabine Rd, MILLNER, NT, 0810

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

859

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

33

3.70% of 892 total ballots.

First preferences

859 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Luke GOSLING
A.L.P.
35841.68%
Aiya GOODRICH CARTTLING
The Greens
19222.35%
Tina MACFARLANE
NT CLP
15918.51%
Kylie BONANNI
Liberal Democrats
768.85%
Emily LOHSE
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
374.31%
Tayla Elise SELFE
United Australia Party
374.31%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

859 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Luke GOSLING
A.L.P.
58768.34%
Tina MACFARLANE
NT CLP
27231.66%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 859 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party58768.34%
Liberal/National Coalition27231.66%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Millner in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

The ID, name, electorate and address match, and coordinates are within 100 metres. This supports a location comparison, not a claim that the same people voted. Redistribution can still alter the surrounding electorate; candidates and parties can change.

Labor TPP: 58.77% in 2025 and 68.34% in 2022; 9.56 percentage points (2022 minus 2025). Each uses that election’s formal-vote denominator.

Use each election’s candidate tables for first preferences and TCP; differing candidate pairs are not a continuous candidate series.

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsMillner1Nightcliff2Rapid Creek3Moil4Nakara5Anula6Ludmilla7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Millner — selected polling place
  2. Nightcliff, Solomon · 1.7 km · 485 formal votes · Labor TPP 73.20%
  3. Rapid Creek, Solomon · 1.7 km · 1,193 formal votes · Labor TPP 69.24%
  4. Moil, Solomon · 2.3 km · 1,054 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.95%
  5. Nakara, Solomon · 3.1 km · 1,207 formal votes · Labor TPP 66.78%
  6. Anula, Solomon · 3.6 km · 511 formal votes · Labor TPP 63.01%
  7. Ludmilla, Solomon · 3.7 km · 679 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.86%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.