2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Chatswood South

North Sydney, NSW · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 77

The Meeting House, 23-25 Stokes St, LANE COVE NORTH, NSW, 2066

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

834

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

57

6.40% of 891 total ballots.

First preferences

834 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Trent ZIMMERMAN
Liberal
26631.89%
Catherine RENSHAW
Labor
22927.46%
Kylea Jane TINK
Independent
16319.54%
Heather ARMSTRONG
The Greens
9911.87%
Robert NALBANDIAN
United Australia Party
232.76%
Dajen TINKLER
Liberal Democrats
151.80%
Michael WALLS
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
131.56%
William BOURKE
Sustainable Australia Party - Stop Overdevelopment / Corruption
101.20%
Victor KLINE
TNL
101.20%
Lesley KINNEY
Informed Medical Options Party
60.72%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

834 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Kylea Jane TINK
Independent
47657.07%
Trent ZIMMERMAN
Liberal
35842.93%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 834 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party46856.12%
Liberal/National Coalition36643.88%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Chatswood South in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

No continuous trend is shown because:

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsChatswood South1Lane Cove East2Lane Cove North Central3Artarmon Central4Chatswood West (North Sydney)5Chatswood West (Bradfield)6Artarmon7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Chatswood South — selected polling place
  2. Lane Cove East, North Sydney · 0.5 km · 1,711 formal votes · Labor TPP 51.72%
  3. Lane Cove North Central, North Sydney · 0.6 km · 633 formal votes · Labor TPP 50.55%
  4. Artarmon Central, North Sydney · 1.0 km · 1,671 formal votes · Labor TPP 58.35%
  5. Chatswood West (North Sydney), North Sydney · 1.0 km · 546 formal votes · Labor TPP 55.31%
  6. Chatswood West (Bradfield), Bradfield · 1.0 km · 445 formal votes · Labor TPP 58.43%
  7. Artarmon, North Sydney · 1.1 km · 942 formal votes · Labor TPP 50.85%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.