2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Baulkham Hills GREENWAY PPVC

Greenway, NSW · Pre-poll centre · AEC polling-place ID 65240

2 Solent Cct, NORWEST, NSW, 2153

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

0

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

0

Unavailable (no votes) of 0 total ballots.

First preferences

0 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Mark Andrew REX
United Australia Party
0Unavailable (no votes)
Michelle ROWLAND
Labor
0Unavailable (no votes)
Adam KACHWALLA
Liberal Democrats
0Unavailable (no votes)
Riccardo Umberto Guerrino BOSI
Independent
0Unavailable (no votes)
Love Preet Singh NANDA
Independent
0Unavailable (no votes)
Rick TURNER
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
0Unavailable (no votes)
Pradeep PATHI
Liberal
0Unavailable (no votes)
Damien ATKINS
The Greens
0Unavailable (no votes)

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

0 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Michelle ROWLAND
Labor
0Unavailable (no votes)
Pradeep PATHI
Liberal
0Unavailable (no votes)

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 0 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party0Unavailable (no votes)
Liberal/National Coalition0Unavailable (no votes)

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Baulkham Hills GREENWAY PPVC in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

No continuous trend is shown because:

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsBaulkham Hills GREENWAY PPVC1Bella Vista2Bella Vista North3Crestwood4Crestwood Central5Baulkham Hills City6Glenwood South7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Baulkham Hills GREENWAY PPVC — selected polling place
  2. Bella Vista, Mitchell · 0.7 km · 994 formal votes · Labor TPP 40.44%
  3. Bella Vista North, Mitchell · 1.2 km · 1,966 formal votes · Labor TPP 36.22%
  4. Crestwood, Mitchell · 1.4 km · 303 formal votes · Labor TPP 40.92%
  5. Crestwood Central, Mitchell · 1.7 km · 1,956 formal votes · Labor TPP 39.21%
  6. Baulkham Hills City, Mitchell · 1.8 km · 1,231 formal votes · Labor TPP 45.33%
  7. Glenwood South, Greenway · 2.2 km · 1,436 formal votes · Labor TPP 62.88%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.