2022 federal House election · Official AEC results

Carnegie West (Goldstein)

Goldstein, VIC · Election-day booth · AEC polling-place ID 3897

Glen Huntly Primary School (West Campus), 175-179 Grange Rd, GLEN HUNTLY, VIC, 3163

Votes recorded at this polling place are not the views of all local residents. People can vote away from home; pre-poll and mobile services cover wider populations. These results are separate from Australian Poll participant sentiment.

Formal votes

831

Denominator for candidate and preferred-vote shares.

Informal votes

38

4.37% of 869 total ballots.

First preferences

831 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Zoe DANIEL
Independent
25330.45%
Tim WILSON
Liberal
20024.07%
Martyn ABBOTT
Australian Labor Party
18021.66%
Alana GALLI-McROSTIE
The Greens
14317.21%
David SEGAL
Liberal Democrats
151.81%
Lisa STARK
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
131.56%
Catherine Frances REYNOLDS
United Australia Party
131.56%
Brandon HOULT
Sustainable Australia Party - Stop Overdevelopment / Corruption
80.96%
Ellie Jean SULLIVAN
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party
60.72%

First preferences count the candidate marked first on each formal ballot.

Two-candidate preferred (TCP)

831 formal votes; informal votes excluded from candidate percentages
Candidate / partyVotesShare
Zoe DANIEL
Independent
55466.67%
Tim WILSON
Liberal
27733.33%

TCP distributes preferences to the final two candidates in this electorate. The pair can include independents or minor parties.

Two-party preferred (TPP)

Labor–Coalition comparison · 831 formal votes
SideVotesShare
Australian Labor Party53664.50%
Liberal/National Coalition29535.50%

TPP is the AEC’s Labor–Coalition measure even where those parties were not the final two candidates. It must not be substituted for TCP.

Compare with 2025

Carnegie West (Goldstein) in 2025 has the same AEC polling-place ID.

No continuous trend is shown because:

Nearby election-day booths

Straight-line distance within 50 km, using AEC coordinates. Nearby booths may serve different electorates and voter groups.

Map of nearby booths

Numbers match the list below. Select a marker for its results link. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; diamonds: mobile/hospital teams. Teams can cover many locations; markers do not show service areas.

A white marker with a double ring groups nearby places: its number is how many places it holds, not a list number. Select it to zoom in.

Street map: © OpenStreetMap contributors. Map tiles show current streets, not historical electorate boundaries. Missing source coordinates remain in the list.

Geographic overview without street tiles

Geographic overview

Numbers match the list below. Circles: election day; squares: pre-poll; triangles: mobile/hospital teams. 7 of 7 places have source coordinates. Teams can cover many locations; their marker is not their service area.

Polling-place locations; use the equivalent numbered list for detailsCarnegie West (Goldstein)1Carnegie West (Higgins)2Carnegie Upper3Carnegie4Caulfield East5Caulfield South East6Carnegie East7

Natural Earth public-domain outline, 1:110m. Geographic overview, not street navigation or electorate boundaries. Missing coordinates stay in the list.

Nearby booths by distance

  1. Carnegie West (Goldstein) — selected polling place
  2. Carnegie West (Higgins), Higgins · 0.0 km · 806 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.17%
  3. Carnegie Upper, Higgins · 0.8 km · 790 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.52%
  4. Carnegie, Higgins · 0.9 km · 1,934 formal votes · Labor TPP 66.55%
  5. Caulfield East, Macnamara · 1.2 km · 997 formal votes · Labor TPP 61.89%
  6. Caulfield South East, Goldstein · 1.3 km · 1,698 formal votes · Labor TPP 44.29%
  7. Carnegie East, Higgins · 1.5 km · 1,278 formal votes · Labor TPP 62.36%

AEC 2022 final-results CSV downloads · generated 2022-07-19T10:31:27 (source timestamp) · retrieved 7 September 2026. © Commonwealth of Australia 2022, CC BY 4.0. Percentages calculated from AEC counts; no endorsement by AEC.

Have your voice heard on housing — an illustrative community discussion, not an election result.