Senate · 2026-08-19 · Parliament 48, division 905
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026
Question recorded in the division register
That the amendments be agreed to
Source context: Committee of the whole amendments on sheet 3995 (Australian Greens)
The question can refer to a separate motion, amendment or earlier proceeding. The source record below is available for inspection; a complete plain-language explanation is awaiting editorial review.
Original parliamentary division (includes result)Show recorded result and member votes
Recorded result: negatived
Ayes: 12 · Noes: 32. Outcome as reported by Parliament; it is not inferred from a simple majority.
All 44 member records supplied for this division. Pairs are listed separately from cast votes. No other members or positions are inferred.
| Party | Ayes | Noes |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 25 |
| Australian Greens | 9 | 0 |
| Liberal Party of Australia | 2 | 6 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
| The Nationals | 0 | 1 |
Ayes — 12 senators
Australian Greens (9)
- Allman-Payne
- Faruqi
- Hanson-Young
- Hodgins-May
- McKim
- Pocock, Barbara
- Shoebridge
- Steele-John
- Waters
Liberal Party of Australia (2)
- McLachlan
- Scarr
Independent (1)
- Pocock, David
Noes — 32 senators
Australian Labor Party (25)
- Ananda-Rajah
- Brown
- Chisholm
- Ciccone
- Cox
- Darmanin
- Dolega
- Dowling
- Gallagher
- Ghosh
- Green
- Grogan
- Lines
- McAllister
- McCarthy
- O'Neill
- Polley
- Sheldon
- Smith, Marielle
- Sterle
- Stewart
- Tyrrell
- Walker
- Walsh
- Whiteaker
Liberal Party of Australia (6)
- Brockman
- Duniam
- Henderson
- Kovacic
- Liddle
- Ruston
The Nationals (1)
- Cadell
Next division: Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026