Senate · 2026-08-19 · Parliament 48, division 902
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026 and two related bills
Question recorded in the division register
That the amendment be agreed to
Source context: Second reading amendment on sheet 4009 (Australian Greens)
The question can refer to a separate motion, amendment or earlier proceeding. The source record below is available for inspection; a complete plain-language explanation is awaiting editorial review.
Original parliamentary division (includes result)Show recorded result and member votes
Recorded result: negatived
Ayes: 11 · Noes: 24. Outcome as reported by Parliament; it is not inferred from a simple majority.
All 35 member records supplied for this division. Pairs are listed separately from cast votes. No other members or positions are inferred.
| Party | Ayes | Noes |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 21 |
| Australian Greens | 9 | 0 |
| Liberal Party of Australia | 0 | 3 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 1 | 0 |
Ayes — 11 senators
Australian Greens (9)
- Allman-Payne
- Faruqi
- Hanson-Young
- Hodgins-May
- McKim
- Pocock, Barbara
- Shoebridge
- Steele-John
- Waters
Independent (1)
- Pocock, David
Jacqui Lambie Network (1)
- Lambie
Noes — 24 senators
Australian Labor Party (21)
- Ananda-Rajah
- Ayres
- Brown
- Chisholm
- Ciccone
- Cox
- Darmanin
- Dolega
- Dowling
- Ghosh
- Green
- Grogan
- Lines
- McAllister
- Sheldon
- Sterle
- Stewart
- Tyrrell
- Walker
- Walsh
- Whiteaker
Liberal Party of Australia (3)
- Brockman
- Henderson
- Kovacic
Next division: Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026 and two related bills