Senate · 2023-08-09 · Parliament 47, division 437
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023
Question recorded in the division register
That the amendments be agreed to
Source context: Australian Greens amendments (1) to (4) and (6) to (9) [sheet 2060]
The question can refer to a separate motion, amendment or earlier proceeding. The source record below is available for inspection; a complete plain-language explanation is awaiting editorial review.
Original parliamentary division (includes result)Show recorded result and member votes
Recorded result: negatived
Ayes: 9 · Noes: 27. Outcome as reported by Parliament; it is not inferred from a simple majority.
All 36 member records supplied for this division. Pairs are listed separately from cast votes. No other members or positions are inferred.
| Party | Ayes | Noes |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 21 |
| Australian Greens | 9 | 0 |
| Liberal Party of Australia | 0 | 2 |
| Independent | 0 | 1 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 0 | 1 |
| The Nationals | 0 | 1 |
| United Australia Party | 0 | 1 |
Ayes — 9 senators
Australian Greens (9)
- Cox
- Faruqi
- Hanson-Young
- McKim
- Pocock, Barbara
- Rice
- Shoebridge
- Waters
- Whish-Wilson
Noes — 27 senators
Australian Labor Party (21)
- Ayres
- Bilyk
- Brown
- Chisholm
- Ciccone
- Farrell
- Green
- Grogan
- McCarthy
- O'Neill
- Payman
- Polley
- Pratt
- Sheldon
- Smith, Marielle
- Sterle
- Stewart
- Urquhart
- Walsh
- Watt
- White
Liberal Party of Australia (2)
- Henderson
- Paterson
Independent (1)
- Pocock, David
Jacqui Lambie Network (1)
- Tyrrell
The Nationals (1)
- Cadell
United Australia Party (1)
- Babet
Next division: Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023