Senate · 2023-06-22 · Parliament 47, division 393
Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023
Question recorded in the division register
That the amendment be agreed to
Source context: Australian Greens amendment (1) [sheet 1966 revised 2]
The question can refer to a separate motion, amendment or earlier proceeding. The source record below is available for inspection; a complete plain-language explanation is awaiting editorial review.
Original parliamentary division (includes result)Show recorded result and member votes
Recorded result: negatived
Ayes: 13 · Noes: 28. Outcome as reported by Parliament; it is not inferred from a simple majority.
All 41 member records supplied for this division. Pairs are listed separately from cast votes. No other members or positions are inferred.
| Party | Ayes | Noes |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 18 |
| Australian Greens | 11 | 0 |
| Liberal Party of Australia | 0 | 6 |
| Independent | 2 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 0 | 2 |
| The Nationals | 0 | 1 |
| United Australia Party | 0 | 1 |
Ayes — 13 senators
Australian Greens (11)
- Allman-Payne
- Cox
- Faruqi
- Hanson-Young
- McKim
- Pocock, Barbara
- Rice
- Shoebridge
- Steele-John
- Waters
- Whish-Wilson
Independent (2)
- Pocock, David
- Thorpe
Noes — 28 senators
Australian Labor Party (18)
- Ayres
- Bilyk
- Brown
- Chisholm
- Ciccone
- Farrell
- Green
- McCarthy
- O'Neill
- Payman
- Polley
- Pratt
- Sheldon
- Smith, Marielle
- Sterle
- Urquhart
- Walsh
- White
Liberal Party of Australia (6)
- Bragg
- Brockman
- Chandler
- Fawcett
- O'Sullivan
- Ruston
Jacqui Lambie Network (2)
- Lambie
- Tyrrell
The Nationals (1)
- Davey
United Australia Party (1)
- Babet
Next division: Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023