Senate · 2023-06-22 · Parliament 47, division 390

Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023

Question recorded in the division register

That the amendment be agreed to

Source context: Second reading amendment (Senator Ruston)

The question can refer to a separate motion, amendment or earlier proceeding. The source record below is available for inspection; a complete plain-language explanation is awaiting editorial review.

Original parliamentary division (includes result)
Show recorded result and member votes

Recorded result: negatived

Ayes: 26 · Noes: 35. Outcome as reported by Parliament; it is not inferred from a simple majority.

All 61 member records supplied for this division. Pairs are listed separately from cast votes. No other members or positions are inferred.

Votes by party, as reported
PartyAyesNoes
Australian Labor Party021
Liberal Party of Australia200
Australian Greens011
The Nationals40
Jacqui Lambie Network02
Country Liberal Party10
Independent01
United Australia Party10
Ayes — 26 senators

Liberal Party of Australia (20)

  • Antic
  • Askew
  • Bragg
  • Brockman
  • Cash
  • Chandler
  • Colbeck
  • Duniam
  • Fawcett
  • Hughes
  • Hume
  • Kovacic
  • Liddle
  • McGrath
  • O'Sullivan
  • Paterson
  • Rennick
  • Reynolds
  • Ruston
  • Scarr

The Nationals (4)

  • Cadell
  • Canavan
  • Davey
  • McKenzie

Country Liberal Party (1)

  • Nampijinpa Price

United Australia Party (1)

  • Babet
Noes — 35 senators

Australian Labor Party (21)

  • Ayres
  • Bilyk
  • Brown
  • Chisholm
  • Ciccone
  • Farrell
  • Green
  • Lines
  • McAllister
  • McCarthy
  • O'Neill
  • Payman
  • Polley
  • Pratt
  • Sheldon
  • Smith, Marielle
  • Sterle
  • Stewart
  • Urquhart
  • Walsh
  • White

Australian Greens (11)

  • Allman-Payne
  • Cox
  • Faruqi
  • Hanson-Young
  • McKim
  • Pocock, Barbara
  • Rice
  • Shoebridge
  • Steele-John
  • Waters
  • Whish-Wilson

Jacqui Lambie Network (2)

  • Lambie
  • Tyrrell

Independent (1)

  • Pocock, David